TWINAGERS
NEWS

02/11/07
Science : beyond the limits
Science has got enormous possibilities: it can solve lots of problems and
improve our life conditions. Nowadays, with staminal cells, nuclear energy and
much more, somebody highly wonder if it is fair to limit science. But did this
question exist also in the past? After reading the novels “Frankenstein or the
modern Prometheus” by M. Shelley and “The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
Hyde” by R. L. Stevenson, we can say that also during the early and mid 19th
century this question was debated. In fact in these two novels we can find the
figure of the “Overreacher”, the scientist who wants to go over the traditional
limits. On one hand, we have Victor Frankenstein, who executes dreadful
experiments with dead bodies and, using galvanism, succeeds in giving life to
his “creature”. Here there is a strong opposition between Dr. Frankenstein and
the traditional scientist, Monsieur Krempe.
In “Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” Jekyll is the overreacher; he wants to extend his
scientific studies to the field of the double nature of our soul. It is this
interest to so ominously and mysterious matters that causes the break of the
friendship between Jekyll and Lanyon (the traditional scientist of this novel).
The novel
“Frankenstein” is also called “The modern Prometheus”. In the Greek myth,
Prometheus was a titan who stole fire from the Gods to give it to men;
“Frankenstein” is a modern transposition of this myth: the scientist Victor
Frankenstein is similar to the titan, because he discovers the secret of life
(the “fire”), that belongs to God.
Moreover, in
Frankenstein the theme of the relationship between science and ethics is also
relevant, while it is marginal in “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde”. In fact from the
first novel it emerges that science is not damaging, but it is our use of it
that can make science useful or dangerous: the creature becomes a killer only
after “he” enters society.
So, according
to Mary Shelley’s thought, scientists have the duty to be careful and aware
about their actions. And , in our opinion, this thought is still modern,
although it is about 200 years old.
Andrea M.,Marco M. Sara A. Valentino C. Liceo Alessi

con la partecipazione del liceo Lurçat
  |